Saturday, December 31, 2016
Friday, December 30, 2016
|Mary Higgins Clark|
So this is the final book of the year and I read only four. Very unlikely of me. Last year, it was 30 books.
But I hope, next year would be different and I am happy that I chose Mary Higgins Clark to end this year with.
We will now move to the story review.
Susan Dempsey was a young girl who wanted to make it big as an actor. Definitely, she had the looks and the talents to make it to the league and finally, the D-day had arrived. She was thrilled to get an audition for a role in a film which was to be directed by Frank Parker. Susan was excited to the core and called her mother to inform that due to the audition she would not be able to attend her father’s birthday party.
But much to her parents’ shock, the next morning, young Susan was found murdered in a park, not too far away from the Director, Frank Parker’s house. Though Parker came under the scanner of the police, there was no substantial evidence to prove his guilt. Because he had a solid alibi.
Twenty years had passed by. Susan’s murderer is still at large. Her father passed away even without knowing who killed his young and only daughter.
But “ the Cinderella story” as named by the press got a revival when Laurie Mauran, the TV producer decided to feature Susan Dempsey’s murder case in her show “ Under Suspicion”. Prior to it, she could solve a similar murder case through her show. Susan’s mother was long waiting for this and pinned every hopes on Laurie. She saw it as the final opportunity to know who killed her daughter.
When I started off, I could not feel like I was reading a MHC book. Maybe, I was too judgmental as it was co- written by Alafair Burke. The MHC books had their own way of putting the readers on tenterhooks right from the first page, just like Agatha Christie books. But that was found missing in the Cinderella Murder case.
I don’t know whether I was being judgmental as there was someone else who contributed to the book. My love for her work was so huge that I could not think of reading a book which she had co-written with her daughter. I know I am being flimsy.
I found a wide disconnect all through the story. There were ingredients that could make it a super thriller. For instance, even after completing a major portion of the book, they did not leave a single clue which could direct us to the murderer though all through the story they introduced many deviant characters capable enough to commit a murder. When the murderer was caught, eventually not in the remotest corner of my heart did I think that person could be the murderer. ( Do I have to warn spoiler alert here ! ). A ideal situation that can make a work a best thriller but unable to sent shivers down my spine.
Is it because, it was a simple plot. Besides, I am not convinced of the reason given to commit the murder.
Something about me.
I have been reading murder mysteries for many years and I always used to boast that I could identify the culprit even before it was revealed by the author. Much to my annoyance, I realised it recently that I was just going for a person or persons who seemed unlikely to commit that murder as there lies the suspense of the story. That was my simple logic. Though I could identify the person, I never made any attempt to offer logical reasoning on why I suspected that person.
This time, I have deliberately refrained myself from focusing on anyone.
Instead, I decided to wait until I come across somebody who had the motive to do so and I could not fix my scanner on anyone.
As I always mentioned in my blog, Mary Higgins Clark’s books always helped me to break my reader’s block. But this time, I was pretty slow while reading the book. But I do not know whether it has got anything to do with the book, my reader’s block apart from the reason mentioned above - Being Judgmental.
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
pic courtesy : www.agathachristie.com
I stumbled upon this website while searching for the list of Agatha Christie books.
An imaginary interview - the idea sounded interesting. Asking all those questions to the author whom you admire the most.
All these answers would not have been new for a reader who follows “ The Queen of Crime” meticulously but would be a revelation to those who have just known her by her fame.
Though I liked the questions and answers I firmly believe think ‘ Dame’ Agatha Christie would have maintained more prudence in the language. But it is pardonable as Rosalba started reading English books only in 2010. The website says she is an Italian freelance journalist who after having worked with Italian newspapers, magazines started this blog to promote literature in two languages - English and Italian.
You can read the full interview here http://www.advicesbooks.com/index.php/interview-agatha-christie/
It might be interesting to go through this site as she has also interviewed William Shakespeare and Jesus Christ.
IMAGINARY INTERVIEW WITH AGATHA CHRISTIE
She is regarded as the Queen of crime and mystery. She is also the most famous writer in the world after God (who wrote the Bible) and William Shakespeare I interviewed a month ago. I am discussing about Agatha Christie, the second female novelist I met through an imaginary interview. During last months, indeed, I have mostly interviewed male famous novelists and I believe that a major room must be left to famous writer women, also. For this likewise important reason, ladies and gentlemen, I interviewed for you, by disturbing her in the heaven, Mrs. Agatha Christie, the writer who invented mystery and unforgettable detective Hercule Poirot.
Rosalba: Mrs. Christie, I am very happy for this interview. I know you dislike publicity and gave few interviews in your life and for this, thank you so much for accepting to being interviewed by me.
Agatha Christie: I dislike publicity, it is true, but I like to meet foreign writers and reviewers like you, my dear Rosalba.
Rosalba: I read your biography and I know you used the last name of your husband in your novels, namely Christie. Which was your true name?
Agatha Christie: My former husband, you should say. But I’ll talk about this later. My true name was Agatha Mary Clarissa Miller. I was born on 15 September 1890 in Torquay, Devon, South West England.
Rosalba: Hence, you are a perfect British writer and a native speaker! Now, I hope you’ll correct my mistakes in English.
Agatha Christie: It will always be a pleasure for me. To tell the truth, I feel to be a French speaker, too.
Rosalba: And why do you feel this?
Agatha Christie: When I was five years, my family spent some times in France, where they rented a house with a French governess, Marie. I learned my erratic French, thanks to her.
Rosalba: Is true that your parents would prevent you to learn reading and writing until you were eight years old?
Agatha Christie: yes, it is damned true. But I got my revenge in my life: first because I learnt at five years, thanks to my siblings who helped me to read secretly from our parents and second because I became a novelist!
Rosalba: Why did you choose to write by using the surname of your husband?
Agatha Christie: Although I was born in a wealthy middle class family, during the previous years the first world war, my mother relocated in Egypt with me and my siblings. They left in 1910 after my father’s death for a chain of deadly heart attacks. There , in 1912, I met my first husband Archie Christie, a qualified aviator who had applied to join the Royal Flying Corps. The first world war, however, separated us, him in France and me in my hometown (Torquay) to work as a voluntary nurse at a war hospital. They were the years that helped me write my first crime stories. In 1916, I wrote, indeed, my debut novel The Mysterious Affair At Styles . The main character was detective Hercule Poirot. I used the surname of my first husband because I was married to him when I wrote my debut novel that would make me very famous later. I can only say I left this surname as a talisman and then because easier to use for my publishers.
Rosalba: I know you debuted very soon and before writing your first mystery with Hercule Poirot.
Agatha Christie: yes, I started writing my stories at 18 years old. Furthermore, you must know my mother was a good storyteller and a passionate writer and, obviously, I became a passionate writer, as well. Mine were short stories that were published revised only in the 1930s.
Rosalba: How long did you take to find a publisher for your first novel?
Agatha Christie: Much time. I took much time to write and later to find a publisher. My debut novel was published at the end of the war when my husband reached me in England and I sent my manuscript to four publishers. The fourth, John Lane of The Bodley Head accepted my manuscript and insisting to make some changes, hired me for other five books. He also proposed me to set the conclusion of my mystery in a library. Then, other famous novels followed such as The Secret Adversary and The Man in the Brown Suit. Since my publisher offered me unfair terms to release the books, I decided to find a literary agent who found a new publisher: William Collins and Sons, namely HarperCollins.
Rosalba: You also wrote very exotic mystery novels, the most famous are also set in the Middle East, such as the unforgettable Murder on the Orient Express, Death on the Nile
, Murder in Mesopotamia and Appointment with Death. Where have you found the inspiration for these novels?
Agatha Christie: In my life, my greatest ambition was to travel on the Orient Express. I had the opportunity to travel on this charming train in 1928. Thanks to this journey, I went to visit the archaeological area in Baghdad and I met archaeologist Max Mallowan who became my second husband. On the train, we loved talking very much and just for these wonderful trips on this marvellous vehicle I got the inspiration to write my novels.
Rosalba: Where you got the inspiration to create the character of Hercule Poirot?
Agatha Christie: First of all, from my childhood in France and then from my experience as a nurse at the war hospital during the first world war. During the war, there were Belgian refugees in most parts of the English countryside, Torquay is no exception. Although Poirot was not based on any particular person, I thought that this Belgian refugee, a former great Belgian policeman, could become a perfect detective for my stories. Moreover, as a nurse, I learnt to use many poisons and this is another reason that inspired me to write crime novels.
Rosalba: What advice would you like to give to modern and aspiring writers?
Agatha Christie: I believe tips and suggestions are evergreen and without time. I can suggest the one I was told by author and family friend Eden Philpotts when I started writing: “The artist is only the glass through which we see nature, and the clearer and more absolutely pure that glass, so much the more perfect picture we can see through it. Never intrude yourself.”
Rosalba: How did you write your novels?
Agatha Christie: I always wrote stories about things I knew, namely my life, my experience, the places and the people I met. Sometimes, to sketch a story in my block notes it was sufficient a talk, a discussion or opinions I heard at a dinner party, for instance. My grandson always described me as a person who listened more than she talked, who saw more than she was seen.” Another my fictional characher, for instance, Miss Marple , was based on the description of my elderly aunt. Plots come to me at such odd moments, when I am walking along the street, or examining a hat shop…Suddenly a splendid idea comes into my head”. I wrote always by hand and then I dictated my written words to a secretary who typed with a machine called Dictaphone.
Rosalba: Yes, you were a great novelist and rewarded with a great career. What do you feel to say at this moment?
Agatha Christie: What can I say now? Thank God for my good life, and for all the love that has been given to me. I wish the same to my colleagues.
Fore more information about Agatha Christie, see this website: http://www.agathachristie.com I used to get the image and information about the writer.
Please also see my translation sample into Italian of Evil Under the Sun, another famous Hercule Poirot mystery by Agatha Christie
Sunday, June 12, 2016
This is my Twentienth book of Mary Higgins Clark, my favourite author. 20 more to go.
Jenny met Erich during one of his exhibitions. He was a renowned painter. And that tryst changed her life forever. Before meeting him, she was a single mother who was struggling hard to make both ends meet. Her two daughters were her world. Though divorced, she was also shelling out money to her ex-husband Kevin, who was dreaming of making it big in acting.
Clark’s simple way of putting things has always helped me to walk with the characters and this time too, it is not different. Jenny got married to Erich in a hurry thinking that she had finally found the right man. What allured Erich to Jenny was her uncanny resemblance to his mother, Catherine. But was he her right man?
Things started going awry when she moved with him to his big mansion in Minnesota farm. Her happiness was short-lived. It all started with Erich insisting Jenny to wear Catherine’s gown which is aqua green in colour. After that, a series of incidents happened one by one which started straining Jenny’s sanity. Was she losing it?
The end was not unexpected. But what caught my attention was the way Clark delved into the psyche of Jenny. When each time she shuddered at various happenings in the mansion, I too shuddered.
I would give 4 stars for the book.
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
This is the first story of Tess Gerritsen which did not excite me or scared me. Long and short, I did not like it and I also did not like how Dr Maura Isles is portrayed as a pining woman for a ' Daniel'.
Still, I will be her fan. Because she is the one who has actually scared the shit out of me through many of her other works.